[-empyre-] Biennales Plus and Minus
Tamiko Thiel
tamiko at alum.mit.edu
Sun Jun 12 18:09:11 EST 2011
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the interesting question on why we did not make the artworks
available as netart!
The Layar technology (www.layar.com) that we use for the intervention is
intrinsically location specific. It geolocates a virtual artwork at a
specific GPS location, and when you are physically present at that
location and search on the name of the artwork you can see it overlayed
on a camera view of the environment you are standing in.
Our artworks for the Venice Biennial Intervention were very much
produced as site specific artworks for the two locations of the Giardini
and Piazza San Marco, and therefore may have a somewhat different
meaning, and certainly have a different emotional impact, at another
location.
This was made most forcefully apparent to me when I developed the AR
artwork "Carnation Rain (Largo do Carmo)" for Carmo Square in Lisbon,
where the Carnation Revolution began. At any other location this
animated rain of carnations is perhaps pretty, perhaps kitschy. But in
Carmo Square, where historic images show the distinctive buildings of
that square surrounded by tanks and soldiers, and these soldiers
(slightly later!) with carnations in their gun barrels, "Carnation Rain"
creates - imho - a powerful and moving statement:
http://www.mission-base.com/tamiko/AR/carnation-rain.html
It is obviously possible to separate the artworks from their context,
and they can be meaningful without those contexts - but the meaning
shifts, as it does with for instance Andy Goldworthy's ordered nature
artworks taken out of their natural setting, or for that matter any
other site-specific works.
Actually, Richard Rinehart is right now playing with this question in
"Not Here," the exhibit of our Venice artworks that he is NOT showing in
the Bucknell University Samek Art Gallery right now. See his press
release at: http://www.bucknell.edu/x70622.xml
We have placed copies of the works outside the gallery doors, and they
will be "let in" to the gallery in the fall when the university opens
again. But when the gallery is open we will show the documentation of
the artworks in Venice in their site-specific setting, to lend context
to how the works are perceived in the gallery without that context.
take care, Tamiko
http://www.mission-base.com/tamiko/
http://manifestarblog.wordpress.com/venice2011/
http://manifestarblog.wordpress.com/thiel_venice-2011/
---
Message: 3 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:36:04 -0400
From: Timothy Murray <tcm1 at cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Biennales Plus and Minus
> >Thanks so much for sharing these links, Tamiko. It's wonderful to
> >have this cartographic trace of such an exciting onsite AR event.
> >It's a fabulous extension of the official biennale process. Great
> >to see stills of the work.
I'm interested by the participants choice not to extend the
availability of the works more broadly online as net.art pieces. Was
this choice a technological determination related to the smartphone
interface and the desire for onsite intervention or were there added
considerations involved.
Thanks.
Tim
More information about the empyre
mailing list