Re: [-empyre-] this is Knot eventFull ::

["][mez][" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>]

At 04:00 PM 30/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
> Hi mez,
> Carl Jung said something, about mysticism, I think it was 'you can't see the
> schism for the mist'. I love concrete poetry too, freedom to say what you
> like, how you like.

how.D barrie [+ other subs],

 ...its not the need [or want] 2 send my codewurks 2 the list that governs 
my lvl of reticence, but more that my method of communication is judged as 
_wankerish_ or superfluous. this need 4 overt blanket simplification or 
reduction of the msg until it becomes supposedly transparent [or attains 
some type of mythical clarity] seems reductionist in the x.treme.

> Its just that sometimes issues get discussed on empyre
> with dozens of difficult words when a few simpler ones would do,

but would they? and according 2 whom?
does the force_majority rule apply here as well? if so, then its a shame - 
2 cut off nuanced + fertile potentialities that r dying left|right|N centre 
via this rigid mainstreaming of net communication avenues........

> yeah right,
> poetic liscence but who is the audience, one or two people maybe who get off
> on the philosophical coloquialisms like I've got a Marx book too, isn't it
> beautiful but I think Kropotkin is better. I'm not going to apologise for
> being dumb and straight after all I got a masters in digital art last year
> by doing an artwork in a design school, that was interesting let me tell
> you. mez please allow me to apologize

apologies r not necessary. i'm not pin_pointing u as a primary source, more 
as a sym[ulcra](em)boli(sm)c manifestation of a trend i find distressing + 
silence-n.ducing.

> and could you give me an url where I
> could see more of your work - I used to write code and I though it was
> poetry when I did a good one.


sure. c:
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker

chunks,
mez



- pro][rating][.lucid.txt
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/txts
_
_men[iscus_heart] plucking via broken bag.ga[u]ges_