[-empyre-] from 'unfinishedness' to 'Game Off'
Julian Oliver
julian at selectparks.net
Sun Mar 2 11:06:13 EST 2008
..on or around Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:21:58PM -0800, Christina McPhee said:
> "So I still didn’t finish the thought on “unfinishedness,” but do
> others have thoughts on whether it is necessary for a project to be
> unfinished or to be immaterial (different but related concepts) for it to
> be participatory? This is a huge discourse now from Nicolas Bourriaud to
> Claire Bishop to Jacques Ranciere. But we wonder what art, design, and
> media creators really think and practice?"
sometimes a /finished/ project can present itself as closed, in the
sense of an artefact sufficiently immutable that it is ready for
interpretation and distribution as a singular cultural object. this is a
legacy from the Fine Arts which traditionally positions the artefact as
a common reference object for purposes of discussion.
in the context of participation - invited or otherwise - an /unfinshed/
project often presents itself as open to participation, to continued
design and/or development. this i see in various open-source tool
development communities quite regularly: in the rare event a 'final
version' is released the tool almost immediately loses cultural value.
i've been involved in, or have initiated, a few free-software projects
that while being art-oriented also seem to benefit from this productive
bias: if the project was declared 'finished' it would be seen to have
less cultural value, it would be denying the possibility of improvement
and thus the potential of its user-base to innovate upon (or simply
influence) the existant.
in other words, a project that declares itself as a process rather than
an artefact defers completion as an affirmation that there is always
room for growth.
furthermore a 'project' is just an idea, it is always immaterial. a
project is suspended between the expectations of people, their belief in
a supposedly common goal and their work toward that goal.
a finished project is past tense. i like to think of 'project' in the
sense of projecting or projection: casting an object toward a target or
surface.
cheers,
--
julian oliver
http://julianoliver.com
http://selectparks.net
messages containing HTML will not be read.
More information about the empyre
mailing list