[-empyre-] Game[r] Output [questions, always questions:)].

[mez breeze]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Margarete Jahrmann
<margarete.jahrmann at zhdk.ch> wrote:
> Cher networker.mez.Twin.Btoxx.Goss.ip!

*Extension.a[vie.fo]rm.flourishes.2.u+urs*
:)

>  So Mez, reading Your description of a synaptic double firing effect,
>  caused by our bilingual coagulation into a Ludic lingo, makes me
>  confident and great full

Wonder.full[nesses]:)

>...because I remember English proofreaders
>  convincing editors not to publish texts for exactly that reason.

Seems ironically symptomatic of _professionalism_ vs _the other_...the
lock-down of preformed statica that status_quo freezes any
potentialities via a rejection of modes external 2 [sanctioned]
institutional perspectives - a process similar 2 the demarcation of
_Art_ + art, as u describe below....

>  Yes, boyz with toys have nasty tricks in moulding snowballs. For
>  example, there exists the pretty unfair practice of putting stones into
>  a snowball, which hurts and spoils the rule of play, because the Boule
>  de Neige is no more distracting into powder snow when hitting you.

just....owW.

>  Art in contrast to art has some stones inside, Kies - which is a slang
>  word in German for money. Please let me appropriate this distinction of
>  Art and art, because it exactly describes, what happens if a compound
>  noun is made of an adjective. I see art as "adjective" process-ual
>  activity. "A referential illusion, intertextual production on the
>  equivocal nature of meaning". Perfectly, out of your practice in arts,
>  You exemplified by this distinction the Language construction of Tlön,
>  introduced by Jorge Luis Borges. Logically enough in this language nouns
>  are based on compound adjectives.

*[y]ears.prickling*...associative_allusion abounding here...

>  In an inverse trajectory by this idea of an imaginary land, Tlön, we are
>  lead back to the >moo parallel worlds, Orbis Tertius, the >Third Life.
>  and the process-ual play practice of art inside these world3.

Indeedily we r.....process.u.all
play/[mo]d[e]uality.in.multiple.m[et]assi[st]ve.branches...

>  Your insight description precisely addresses the focal points of the
>  Arts system: imposition of an order couched in aesthetic strategies,
>  canonisation according to market mechanisms to maintain systemic
>  stability. There's nothing to add.

Purrhaps instead of adding _here_: delve + swoop in.g[c]ame[vitr]o?

>  art, to me, apparently constitutes as vehicle. By riding this 'patabike,
>  following the internal logics of arts, one can easily insist in applying
>  a practice, distinct from the logics of investigative science systems -
>  although addressing often similar fields of life.
>  this opens ways for new methodologies - like entering games, exporting
>  moo realities into reality engines, playing with aesthetic formats in
>  experimenting with in world and game engine effects - towards a nybble
>  engine.

So this motion>vehicle practice based arts notion directs itself
according 2 the|a fusion of creativity + in_world|technical game
parameters?

>  a response couched in aesthetic strategies
>  that adopt parts of your argument
>  margarete

Purrfect.

Thx 4 ur response, M.
N.M|BT|Goss|NT


-- 
: mmo.[s]tabbings.ripple+sh[ape.avian.l]ift :
: http://netwurker.livejournal.com
: http://disapposable.blogspot.com/
: http://twitter.com/netwurker