[-empyre-] Week Three Guests: Bernagozzi (x2), Bainbridge, Turim

[Murat Nemet-Nejat]

One question: how much were these experiments influenced (or used as
starting points) film techniques such as zooms, fades, etc. ?

Murat

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Turim,Maureen Cheryn <mturim at ufl.edu>
wrote:

> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
> I enjoyed Jason's comments on the Woobulator, and the function of the
> machine as device for revising the image.  I welcome Murita's observation
> that cinema has many different potential epistemologies, depending on how
> its deployed.  I think the exhibit, by displaying the plans for the
> devices, the actual machinery, and the works produced by artists in
> residence, does justice to the sense watching the process unfold that
> artists were not just using tools, but working to engage technologies that
> had their own creative and deconstructive potentials.  In other word the
> machines needed to be read, a phrase Scott Nygren and I used in writing
> about work of the Vasulkas.
> ________________________________________
> From: empyre-bounces at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au <
> empyre-bounces at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au> on behalf of Murat
> Nemet-Nejat <muratnn at gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 9:12 PM
> To: soft_skinned_space
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Week Three Guests: Bernagozzi (x2), Bainbridge,
> Turim
>
> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20150927/ae16e79f/attachment.html>