[-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 143, Issue 12
Adeena Karasick
adeenakarasick at cs.com
Sat Nov 12 13:17:59 AEDT 2016
Hey everyone-- so sorry to upset anyone! Puissance means force and power, and my parodic title was meant in the spirit of intervention, subversion, of re empowerment. So sorry to cause a problem -- last thing I was intending. Looking forward to some real dialogue
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 8:00 PM, <empyre-request at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au> <empyre-request at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
>
> Send empyre mailing list submissions to
> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/empyre
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> empyre-request at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> empyre-owner at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of empyre digest..."
>
>
> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: SECOND WEEK GRAB EM BY THE PUISSANCE empyre Digest, Vol
> 143, Issue 8 (Macon Reed)
> 2. Re: SECOND WEEK GRAB EM BY THE PUISSANCE empyre Digest, Vol
> 143, Issue 8 (Murat Nemet-Nejat)
> 3. Re: Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and Alan
> Sondheim (Adeena Karasick) (William Bain)
> 4. Re: empyre Digest, Vol 143, Issue 8 (Adeena Karasick)
> 5. Re: your language games (Johannes Birringer)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:05:43 -0500
> From: Macon Reed <swapmeetproject at gmail.com>
> To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] SECOND WEEK GRAB EM BY THE PUISSANCE empyre
> Digest, Vol 143, Issue 8
> Message-ID:
> <CAMM+hrxTEExAnw+BRteQuj55kcPUTyiWuvE-4LTpu_OtCTK7Kg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Just a note to this group, I really do not want to get any more emails in
> my inbox with references to that grab them by the pussy line form trump. I
> have to live as a woman and as some one with a vagina under this government
> and really dont want to hear any jokes or lines about that from him. I hope
> this can be understood. Its just not funny and the grief and rage are
> enough as they are. Thanks.
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Alan Sondheim <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>>
>> I'm confused, Murat - that seemed to be Adeena's position, not mine.
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Murat Nemet-Nejat wrote:
>>
>> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>>>
>>
>> ==
>> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
>> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
>> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/ug.txt
>> ==
>> _______________________________________________
>> empyre forum
>> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>> http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20161110/7e87547a/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:14:51 -0500
> From: Murat Nemet-Nejat <muratnn at gmail.com>
> To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] SECOND WEEK GRAB EM BY THE PUISSANCE empyre
> Digest, Vol 143, Issue 8
> Message-ID:
> <CAC0TkuY=uCiaMp-wsgQHdJ2WxdeJxju11oghP_+7QJZ3AMNzPA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> So, I have been obviously confused. Yes, my response is to what Adeena is
> saying. Simultaneously, I was thinking about our arguments about science.
> You believed that physics will give us one day a theory that synthesized
> all contradictions and explained everything. I said there is no reason to
> believe that, that that believe finally is an illusion.
>
> Murat
>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Alan Sondheim <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>>
>> I'm confused, Murat - that seemed to be Adeena's position, not mine.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Murat Nemet-Nejat wrote:
>>
>> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>>>
>>
>> ==
>> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
>> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
>> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/ug.txt
>> ==
>> _______________________________________________
>> empyre forum
>> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>> http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20161110/d88cd5be/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 08:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
> From: William Bain <willronb at yahoo.com>
> To: "empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au"
> <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and
> Alan Sondheim (Adeena Karasick)
> Message-ID: <2056998987.1702849.1478853383908 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I? hat to say this but Adeena in Victoria (on Vispo)is, Adeena, spellbinding. Whether this is scatter orsplatter or things-all-at-once, well, choose your view
> points... When I saw that reference *Kant* comeup I thought of what Kristeva somewhere calls *thelost time* the return to the joy-paranoia of the maternal object. Jouissance on the Dharma road....?Thanks very much! Best wishes, William
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20161111/e32172c9/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:05:23 -0500
> From: Adeena Karasick <adeenakarasick at cs.com>
> To: empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] empyre Digest, Vol 143, Issue 8
> Message-ID: <15851c6a64a-40ea-1f2e5 at webprd-m44.mail.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> All through the nightmarish disbelief and utter delirium of yesterday, I kept wanting to post something here, but it felt frivolous, indulgent to be thinking about language games; about the celebration of multiplicity given the very real effects of the duplicity that we find all around us.
>
>
> But, in the apocalyptic aftermath of yesterday, I am awake. And I keep thinking about how language is entwined with being; (whether for Wittgenstein, Sapir Whorf or Kabbalah for that matter), language is inseparable from perception, cognition, behavior. And its very renegade multiplicitous excess, (evident in Alan?s ?splatter texts? or Murat?s interventions, our multiple readings), it?s this very Sprachspiel that will save us?it?s precisely through our attention to these ?games? that transformation and change happen.
>
>
> If rules of language are analogous to the rules of games; ie if saying something in language is analogous to making a move in a game, (each with its own codes, grammar, relations, contexts), and though we never fully know the rules of the game, we are always learning, internalizing, and becoming intimate with a massive, multipart, global algorithm, discovering is ALLEGO?RHYTHMS; simultaneously learning and unlearning the systems, the codes.
>
>
> And I think this is something that binds all 3 of us, Alan and Murat ? especially here I?m thinking of your fantastic essay at the end of "Hamlet and Its Hidden Texts: Poems as Commentary in Murat?s new Animals of Dawn (which was an amazing pleasure to read).
> The idea that not just that the rules are infinitely changing but that you have to go inside the game and change the game.
>
>
>
>
> Adeena Karasick
> adeenakarasick at cs.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: empyre-request <empyre-request at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> To: empyre <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> Sent: Tue, Nov 8, 2016 8:00 pm
> Subject: empyre Digest, Vol 143, Issue 8
>
> Send empyre mailing list submissions to
> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/empyre
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> empyre-request at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> empyre-owner at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of empyre digest..."
>
>
> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and Alan Sondheim
> (Murat Nemet-Nejat)
> 2. Recent work on 'semiotic splatter' / introduction (Alan Sondheim)
> 3. Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and Alan Sondheim
> (Adeena Karasick)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:24:59 -0500
> From: Murat Nemet-Nejat <muratnn at gmail.com>
> To: empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> Subject: [-empyre-] Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and
> Alan Sondheim
> Message-ID: <911A0AB6-7972-460E-866B-A4E5B1C1E278 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> The origin of the computer involved the decoding of "enigma," a mystery?a desire to penetrate the impenetrable, the veiled, violating the inner sanctum of an enemy in a time of war. Demobbed, in a time of "peace," the computer became as aggressive tool of seduction, offering algorithmic possibilities for happiness and ease/ or obeisance and abjection. (I hope by the end of the day we don't discover that Donald Trump is the apotheosis of this virtual existence where a lie is equal to truth and being "bored with success" is the coin of the realm.)
>
>
> Both ADEENA KARASICK and ALAN SONDHEIM are intensely attuned to the deep effect of the computer in contemporary life and culture. While embracing and even ingesting its pervasive presence and adopting its tools to their poetic/artistic purposes, each in her or his way carries out a rear guard action against it, in essential ways redefining or critiquing its nature.
>
> Worddance of a woman of valor?Salome: Canadian poet, performance artist and librettist ADEENA KARASICK is acutely attuned to the seductive impulse that lies at the heart of the computer. But she transforms its hostile functionality to an ecstatic dance of feminist (religious) empowerment and sensual self affirmation. Against an idea of infinity embedded in algorithmic proliferations, she posits a counter narrative?the infinity the 13th century Kabbalist Abulafia (the contemporary of the Sufi poets Rumi and Yunus Emre in Anatolia) saw within a play/dance of language. That's the way Karasick describes it: " For the past couple of decades, I?ve been consumed with how a sense of infinite linguistic play leads not to paralysis'... [But] its seductive swathes of color texture, image typographies are synechdochic of how meaning unveils itself as an ever-spiraling space where ?Origin? is unlocateable [italics my own]." Karasick returns to the unlocatable mystery at the origin of the
> computer.
>
> "Artist, writer, and musician, working in entangled media," ALAN SONDHEIM is inherently suspicious of the ability of the computer finally to reveal the secret embedded in the enigma. Rather, he sees it as a series problematic codes full of holes, created and combined, proliferating into ever larger systems. Yet the gaps remain, and humanity, culture remain entangled with them. In their skepticism of a final "localized" meaning, Sondheim and Karasick are similar to each other; but, tonally, extremely different. For her, the continuous change with "unlocatable origin" is ecstatic. His is melancholy, infused with a sense of catastrophe and dissolution. His work is a continuous meditation on endless human entanglements with codes and the wounds they inflict. Here is how he describes it: " I have been working with computers for decades, and specifically with virtual worlds and motion capture for the past fifteen or so. I developed the notion of 'codework' to indicate works in wh
> ich code is presenced on the surface, but problematic - works in which meaning uneasily inhabits distinctions among 'worlds of the work' and program-spaces. Of course the distinctions themselves are problematic and entangled among many other things, such as the body, abjection, and 'dirt' in the mix. In motion capture, I've worked with altered software and mapping, producing distorted avatars and avatar behaviors. In virtual worlds, I've been working with concepts of gamespace, edgespace, and blankspace...."
>
>
> To know more about Sondheim's vast work, one can read the interview "Surging Towards Abjection: an Interview with Alan Sondheim" in The Rain Taxi (http://www.raintaxi.com/?s=Alan+Sondheim+Interview).
>
>
>
> I hope the members of the list will participate in the discussions around the works of these two artists.
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20161108/abe04602/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:41:54 -0500 (EST)
> From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim at panix.com>
> To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> Subject: [-empyre-] Recent work on 'semiotic splatter' / introduction
> Message-ID: <alpine.NEB.2.20.1611081141160.12064 at panix3.panix.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
>
>
> My name is Alan Sondheim and I approve this message. I'm an
> artist, writer, and musician, working in entangled media.
>
> Recently, I've been think of "semiotic splatter" - fragmented
> and chaotic semiosis (the process of signification in language
> or literature, the production of meaning), and splatter both as
> control and dissolution. I use this term to indicate that
> semiosis is never totalized, that it falls apart, fails,
> coagulates and clumps; it's related to an incessant presencing
> of material which appears more and more stale and derogated.
> Semiotic splatter is related as well to strange attractors in
> chaos theory and leads to the problematic of semiosis and
> "coagulative hardening" - for example the rise of
> totalitarianism out of (political, economic) chaos.
>
> The semiotic splatter work is at
> http://www.alansondheim.org/splatter.txt - a good introduction
> to my work in general.
>
> A word about my practice - to write and produce as continuous
> praxis; ; I've been doing daily pieces (text/music/image/video)
> since 1994, as an ongoing meditation - first, on 'cyberspace,'
> but now extended elsewhere. The pieces are organized through a
> series of texts; the most recent are at
> http://www.alansondheim.org/uf.txt and
> http://www.alansondheim.org/ug.txt .
>
> Thanks to Murat, Renate, and Timothy, for the invitation to
> participate for the week!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:26:09 -0500
> From: Adeena Karasick <adeenakarasick at cs.com>
> To: empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> Subject: [-empyre-] Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and
> Alan Sondheim
> Message-ID: <158460c6d65-20de-16603 at webprd-a32.mail.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> Well here goes --
> some thoughts about play and power
> on this auspicious eve
>
>
>
> A Juiced-up Jewy Jouissance of Multi-Media Dialectics
>
>
> If according toWittgenstein?s Tractatus, the rulesof language are analogous to the rules of games; and if for Lyotard meaning isconstructed through libidinous play, and for Baudrillard,the notion of the ?real? is a play of simulation and images, media poetics, reminds us how communication itselfis a massive, multipart and global algorhythm a celebratory praxis of pulsing plays,appel?es (callings), pulls, pliespli?s of hyper-spatial interplays, re/p/laced in plaisir. For the past 3 decades,I?ve been consumed with a sense of ?linguistic play?, a play that leads not to ?paralysis? but ?because each luxuriant letter, phrase, meme is saturated with ideological codes,intertextually drenched palimpsested systems, must be read as an ever-shiftingpolitical social or gendered logospace of ambi-valence.
>
> Recently,I was working in collaboration with vispoetic media artist and theorist, Jim Andrews,using dbCinema, a graphic synthesizer, where 'brushes' sample from a set ofspecified images. Essentially using them as 'paint', they are fragmented,palimpsested, bifurcated highlighting the construction of memory, meaningproduction, the materiality of language and the ever-recombinatory swirlingnature of communication; forgrounding how language is always-alreadyintertextatically layered and proprioceptively received.
>
> http://vispo.com/adeena/vic7/index.htm?n=1
> http://vispo.com/adeena/vids/concatenation.mp4
>
> Drawing on two distinctbodies of work, Salom?: Woman of Valor, (the libretto from myOpera; re-visioning the apocryphal figure through a feminist, Kabbalistic lens)and Checking In (a listing of fauxFacebook status updates), its seductive swathes of color texture, image typographiesare synecdochic of how meaning unveils itself as an ever-spiraling space where?Origin? is unlocateable; and everything?s a re-articulation of are-articulation, an erupting in an irrepresentable present non present orresonant present that continually escapes itself. And as such, puts into play a kinda Lyotardian dissimulation; alibidinous ?freeing-up? of structures for maximum potentiality of expression; highlightinghow through a plurality of regimes, ?phrases? maintain their own rules,criteria and methods, and how meaning-making is always an anti-hegemonic playof signification
>
> As outlined by Avraham,Abulafia, 13th C. Kabbalistic mystic, in his Science of theCombination of Letters, we are instructed to play inside the language, using ancientpractices of recombinatoric alchemy; gematriatic (numerological) substitution, combination,and through lettristic ?skips? and ?jumps? slippage, meaning is infinitelyre-circulated. According to Kabbalistic thinking, we are ?commanded to permute and combine theletters; focus on them and their configurations, permutations; combineconsonants into a swift motion, which heats up your thinking and increases yourjoy and desire so much, that you don?t crave food or sleep and all otherdesires are annihilated. And nothing exists except the letters through whichthe world is being recreated; through a continual process of constructing andre-constructing borders, orders, laws, mirrors, screens, walls; through acaterwaulery of lolling scrolls brawling sprawls of extracted maculatesbracketed tracks, hacked fractures.
>
> And this play is never merely ?free play of association?,
> frivolous or free-floating but like in Wittgenstein?s Sprachspiel,
> always already operates through certain identifiable structures, codes,logics, idioms. And communicationnecessarily becomes a praxis of palimpsest and dissemination, generating acontiguous infolding of meaning ?
>
> Theseinfinite (algorithmic) openings, though overwhelming are not equal to no choice at all, but rather -- swirling through Hebrew, Aramaic, Englishand Yiddish, multiple creators, aesthetics, histories and codes, is synecdochic of howlanguage is always between multiplecultures and traditions, renditions and re-codings ? how meaning slips betweendifference, appliance, appearance, and never possesses some portable anduniversal context. But rather as Wittgenstein?s description of a?language-game,? meaning ?consist[s] of language and the actions into which itis woven.? And functioning through friction transgression, invasion,contradiction, ambiguity, thrives on rhetorical strategies of ornament andexcess, heterogeneity and paradox, hybridity and desire.
>
>
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:24:59
> From: Murat Nemet-Nejat <muratnn at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> To: empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> Subject: [-empyre-] Starting the Second Week / Adeena Karasick and Alan Sondheim
>
> ----------empyre- soft-skinned space----------------------
>
> The origin of the computer involved the decoding of"enigma," a mystery?a desire to penetrate the impenetrable, theveiled, violating the inner sanctum of an enemy in a time of war. Demobbed, ina time of "peace," the computer became as aggressive tool ofseduction, offering algorithmic possibilities for happiness and ease/ or obeisanceand abjection. (I hope by the end of the day we don't discover that DonaldTrump is the apotheosis of this virtual existence where a lie is equal to truthand being "bored with success" is the coin of the realm.)
>
> Both ADEENA KARASICK and ALAN SONDHEIM are intensely attunedto the deep effect of the computer in contemporary life and culture. Whileembracing and even ingesting its pervasive presence and adopting its tools totheir poetic/artistic purposes, each in her or his way carries out a rear guardaction against it, in essential ways redefining or critiquing its nature.
> Worddance of a womanof valor?Salome: Canadian poet, performance artist and librettist ADEENAKARASICK is acutely attuned to the seductive impulse that lies at the heart ofthe computer. But she transforms its hostile functionality to an ecstatic danceof feminist (religious) empowerment and sensual self affirmation. Against an ideaof infinity embedded in algorithmic proliferations, she posits a counternarrative?the infinity the 13th century Kabbalist Abulafia (the contemporary ofthe Sufi poets Rumi and Yunus Emre in Anatolia) saw within a play/dance of language.That's the way Karasick describes it: " For the past couple ofdecades, I?ve been consumed with how a sense of infinite linguistic play leadsnot to paralysis'... [But] its seductive swathes of color texture, image typographies aresynechdochic of how meaning unveils itself as an ever-spiraling space where?Origin? is unlocateable [italics myown]." Karasick returns to the unlocatable mystery atthe origin of the computer.
> "Artist, writer, and musician, working in entangled media," ALANSONDHEIM is inherently suspicious of the ability of the computer finally toreveal the secret embedded in the enigma. Rather, he sees it as a series problematiccodes full of holes, created and combined, proliferating into ever largersystems. Yet the gaps remain, and humanity, culture remain entangled with them.In their skepticism of a final "localized" meaning, Sondheim and Karasick are similar to each other; but, tonally, extremely different. For her, thecontinuous change with "unlocatable origin" is ecstatic. His ismelancholy, infused with a sense of catastrophe and dissolution. His work is acontinuous meditation on endless human entanglements with codes and the woundsthey inflict. Here is how he describes it: " I have been working withcomputers for decades, and specifically with virtual worlds and motion capturefor the past fifteen or so. I developed the notion of 'codework' to indicateworks in which code is p
> resenced on the surface, but problematic - works inwhich meaning uneasily inhabits distinctions among 'worlds of the work' andprogram-spaces. Of course the distinctions themselves are problematic andentangled among many other things, such as the body, abjection, and 'dirt' inthe mix. In motion capture, I've worked with altered software and mapping,producing distorted avatars and avatar behaviors. In virtual worlds, I've beenworking with concepts of gamespace, edgespace, and blankspace...."
>
>
> To know more about Sondheim's vast work, one can read theinterview "Surging Towards Abjection: an Interview with AlanSondheim" in The Rain Taxi (http://www.raintaxi.com/?s=Alan+Sondheim+Interview).
>
> I hope the members of the list will participate in thediscussions around the works of these two artists.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre forum
> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20161108/ed039cbf/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre mailing list
> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
>
>
> End of empyre Digest, Vol 143, Issue 8
> **************************************
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au/pipermail/empyre/attachments/20161111/b5b89604/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:48:01 +0000
> From: Johannes Birringer <Johannes.Birringer at brunel.ac.uk>
> To: soft_skinned_space <empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [-empyre-] your language games
> Message-ID:
> <899F3B65F6A5C8419026D0262D3CECB86761DD95 at v-ex10mb2.academic.windsor>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
>
> Not sure I can follow or want to follow your frivolous language games here. in the aftermath of what you call delirious or nightmarish.
> What does it mean, in socio-economic or political terms, to argue that you in a game at all times and (Murat suggests) as pawns at all times
> where there are no rules or infinitely changeable rules.
> and what wind exactly made the elections come out the way they did, in the united states or in britain?
>
> regards
> johannes birringer
>
>
> +=
> [Adeena Karasick schreibt]
>
> All through the nightmarish disbelief and utter delirium of yesterday, I kept wanting to post something here, but it felt frivolous, indulgent to be thinking about language games; about the celebration of multiplicity given the very real effects of the duplicity that we find all around us.
>
>
> But, in the apocalyptic aftermath of yesterday, I am awake. And I keep thinking about how language is entwined with being; (whether for Wittgenstein, Sapir Whorf or Kabbalah for that matter), language is inseparable from perception, cognition, behavior. And its very renegade multiplicitous excess, (evident in Alan???s ???splatter texts??? or Murat???s interventions, our multiple readings), it???s this very Sprachspiel that will save us???it???s precisely through our attention to these ???games??? that transformation and change happen.
>
>
> If rules of language are analogous to the rules of games; ie if saying something in language is analogous to making a move in a game, (each with its own codes, grammar, relations, contexts), and though we never fully know the rules of the game, we are always learning, internalizing, and becoming intimate with a massive, multipart, global algorithm, discovering is ALLEGO???RHYTHMS; simultaneously learning and unlearning the systems, the codes.
>
>
> And I think this is something that binds all 3 of us, Alan and Murat ??? especially here I???m thinking of your fantastic essay at the end of "Hamlet and Its Hidden Texts: Poems as Commentary in Murat???s new Animals of Dawn (which was an amazing pleasure to read).
> The idea that not just that the rules are infinitely changing but that you have to go inside the game and change the game.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> empyre mailing list
> empyre at lists.artdesign.unsw.edu.au
> http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
>
>
> End of empyre Digest, Vol 143, Issue 12
> ***************************************
More information about the empyre
mailing list